|
Washington
Debates Whether Castro Has Germ Weapons
Mary Anastasia O'Grady
The Wall Street Journal
6 September 2002
Is Fidel Castro busy cooking up viruses in
Cuban labs to share with Islamic
fundamentalists? To the pro-Castro lobby in
America this is nothing more than a
crackpot conspiracy theory devised by
Miami's right-wing extremists. But to some
reputable intelligence experts, the case is
not so open and shut. It would be alarmist
to warn of an impending attack but it would
be irresponsible to ignore some
disconcerting signals and not remain
vigilant.
Exhibit A in the case is Castro's warm
relationship with sworn enemies of the U.S.
In May the Cuban dictator went to Iran,
which the U.S. labels as the world's most
active supporter of terrorism. He was
received by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who
declared that "U.S. grandeur can be broken,"
and that if it is "it will be a service
rendered to mankind and even the American
people."
Not to be outdone, Castro told the Iranians,
according to the Associated Press, that the
U.S. is an "imperialist king" that "will
finally fall, just as your king was
overthrown." Other AP reports said that the
maximum leader, as Castro calls himself,
received an honorary doctorate from a
Tehran
university in recognition of his struggle
against the
U.S.
Upon his departure, he declared that he had
made new friends and left "with optimism
about future ties."
In July Castro sent his close confidant
Rodrigo Alvarez Cambras -- a congressman
and the head of the Cuban-Iraqi Friendship
Society -- to Iraq as an envoy. According
to BBC reports from Iraqi TV and Iraq Radio
in
Baghdad,
Alvarez Cambras met with Saddam Hussein to
convey a "verbal message" on behalf of
Castro and also with Deputy Prime Minister
Tariq Aziz. His meetings were boilerplate
Fidelismo: Down with Yankee aggression and
up with solidarity with
Iraq.
During an April visit he had included
commentary on the Middle East. "Condemning
the Zionist crimes against our people in
Palestine, Cambras described them as Nazi
crimes," reported the BBC, monitoring the
Iraqi News Agency.
Exhibit B in the case by those who claim
that the Cuban regime is up to nefarious
biological projects is testimony from
U.S.
intelligence. Carl Ford, Jr. is Assistant
Secretary for Intelligence and Research at
the State Department and as such deals
regularly with the Central Intelligence
Agency and other U.S. intelligence bodies.
On June 5, Mr. Ford told a subcommittee of
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee -- as
he told the full committee on March 19 --
that the U.S. "believes that Cuba has at
least a limited developmental offensive
biological warfare research and development
effort. Cuba has provided dual-use
technology to rogue states. We are concerned
that such technology could support BW [bioweapons]
programs in those states."
Mr. Ford said there is no "smoking gun" but
also explained how difficult it is to
ascertain the truth about such efforts. "The
nature of biological weapons makes it
difficult to procure clear incontrovertible
proof that a country is engaged in illicit
biological weapons research, production, weaponization
and stockpiling.
Cuba's
sophisticated denial and deception
practices make our task even more
difficult." He later said that, "If you
have the facilities to do medical,
biotechnological research, you have
facilities to build a biological weapon,
unfortunately."
Mr. Ford said "We feel very confident about
saying that they're working and have been
working on an effort that would give them a
BW -- limited BW offensive capability. And
that's serious enough to tell you about it."
When Virginia Sen. George Allen asked Mr.
Ford whether the U.S. believes Cuban
assistance to Iran is "simply helping
Tehran's public health program," Mr. Ford
said, "We don't know," but also requested an
opportunity to answer the question more
fully in a closed session.
The classified nature of so much of the
intelligence surrounding this question may
be making it harder for the Bush
administration to make its case. In a
letter to Florida Rep. Lincoln Díaz-Balart
on July 22, the Undersecretary of State for
Arms Control and International Security,
John Bolton, wrote that he raised the issue
because "of numerous references I have seen
to a Cuban BW effort in classified CIA and
DIA analyses."
There are also a number of allegations from
Cuban defectors who, like the State
Department, have stopped short of
proclaiming certainty about a Cuban
biological weapons program but have
assigned high probabilities to it. Sorting
out whether they are telling the truth or
simply trying to create new opportunities
for themselves will take time and effort.
But in the interest of homeland defense, it
would seem that their stories are worth
listening to.
There is also Ken Alibek, once the deputy
director of research and production for the
Soviet biological weapons program. He has
written that his boss back in the U.S.S.R.
had been convinced that Cuba had a
bioweapons program after he returned from a
trip there in 1990.
The anti-embargo lobby in
Washington
appears to have been quite taken aback by
Mr. Bolton's May 6 speech at the Heritage
Foundation, when he first spoke publicly
about the issue. Not surprisingly, there was
a tone of concern about whether he might
have made the speech for political purposes,
as a favor to the Bush administration's
Cuban exile constituency. But Mr. Bolton
has defended his actions, pointing out that
he was only repeating what Mr. Ford had
said in his March testimony.
Furthermore, in his July 22 letter, he said
this: "Cuba continues to seek to undermine
U.S. national security through the use of
espionage. So the question policymakers
must answer is whether there is sufficient
information to alert the American public
and the Congress about the potential threat
Cuba's BW effort poses to the United
States. We strongly believe that the answer
to that question is 'yes.' The American
people deserve to know. Particularly in
light of the terrorist attacks of September
11, we feel obligated to tell the public
about Cuba's BW effort. The intelligence
community has known about this threat for
several years, as have the intelligence
oversight committees."
Having experienced terrorism first-hand,
Americans want to take fewer chances with
tyrants who live by fomenting hatred. That
shoe certainly fits Fidel Castro, even if
it's not convenient for foes of the embargo.
Top
^
|