|
A Cuban Southerner’s Defense of the South:
An Interview with Dr. Miguel A. Faria, Jr.
Myles Kantor
With Trent Lott ready to have burned Robert
E. Lee in effigy to stay in office, it’s
refreshing to see Southerners like Dr.
Miguel A. Faria, Jr. Dr. Faria is the author
of
Medical
Warrior: Fighting Corporate Socialized
Medicine,
Vandals at
the Gates of Medicine, and most
recently
Cuba in
Revolution: Escape From a Lost Paradise.
He is also editor of the
Medical
Sentinel, the journal of the
Association
of American Physicians and Surgeons.
All of his books are available through
www.haciendapub.com. A retired
neurosurgeon, Dr. Faria lives in Macon,
Georgia.
Why did you and your family move to the
South?
We moved south because it was an excellent
opportunity for my father, who had just
completed all of his medical
re-certification requirements to practice
medicine in the
U.S.
By chance, the best job opportunity offered
to him was in
Columbia,
South Carolina,
at the State hospital. Coincidentally, the
rest of our family, my mother, sister
Mercedes and cousin Clara, had just joined
us in the United States. My father told us
we needed to relocate from
Miami
for his new job and, most importantly, to
learn to be Americans.
"We needed to never forget our roots," he
said. Nevertheless, "we were now to fully
learn English and be assimilated into the
American way of life!" My father and I had
lived in Miami from 1966 to 1968, but that
was culturally like living in a liberated
Cuba, in "Little Havana." Although
Miami
is south according to the geographic
compass, we were now heading to the real
South, to
South Carolina, virtually in the Deep South,
to begin a new life.
Why did you attend college and medical
school in the South?
When we first told our friends in
Miami
that we would be moving to South Carolina,
they could not believe it. Not only were we
moving from the center of the Cuban world in
exile, the "Little Havana" area, but we were
moving to the "boondocks" of the South. They
actually feared for our lives because of all
the propaganda that Fidel Castro had given
to race politics (and riots) in the U.S.
After all, we were dark-skinned Cubans, who
still did not command the language or the
culture of our new country. Who knows what
the KKK would do to us after we had left the
haven of Miami to move to the "sticks" of
South Carolina?
After all, this was 1968 and race riots were
in full swing.
But the Southern people we were supposed to
fear welcomed us with open arms. We were
treated very well in
Columbia,
South Carolina.
I attended high school and college (the
University of South Carolina, 1970–1973)
there. I could have used the newly
instituted affirmative action to go to
Harvard or any other Ivy League school of my
choice in the North. I had the grades and
the ethnicity (i.e., Hispanic). Instead, I
opted to stay in the South and rejected the
use of affirmative action for any special
consideration. Likewise in 1974, with
excellent grades (magna cum laude) I could
have gone to any medical school I wanted.
Again, I opted to attend the Medical
University of South Carolina in Charleston,
where I met my beloved wife Helen.
Eventually we moved to
Atlanta,
Georgia
to complete my residency training in
neurological surgery at Emory University. We
moved to Macon, Georgia because I was needed
there as a neurosurgeon and because I felt
it was a town that had held onto its
southern heritage and traditions. We brought
up our family there, our children, Miguel,
Elena, and Gabriela. We still love living in
that southern town.
You mentioned Castro’s racial propaganda.
Would you please elaborate on that?
Castro's speeches and news film clips of
U.S. riots showed white policemen attacking
black rioters with dogs. This was shown
repeatedly on TV and in the movie theaters
in between movies and programming. If my
memory serves me correctly, it started soon
after the triumph of the Revolution, but
escalated as he became more secure in power
and felt free to openly display his hatred
for the
United States.
Race relations in the United States were
something that Castro exploited to the hilt.
Why do you live in the South today?
We love the South and the southern way of
life. People are definitely more hospitable,
civil, and polite than in the North.
Southerners are still chivalrous toward
women, respectful to elders, and nurturing
to their children. Fathers still teach their
youngsters, both boys and girls, to fish and
hunt. Mothers teach their girls proper
manners and etiquette.
Southerners will still strike up
conversation with strangers and make them
friends in parks, restaurants, grocery
stores, and at the many outdoor festivities
and activities. Honor and duty, like
chivalry, scarce commodities elsewhere, are
still to be found in the South. Here
law-abiding citizens are still widely
allowed to exercise their Second Amendment
rights, and because of concealed carry laws,
the crime rate has been dropping faster than
in the rest of the nation.
Incidents like the brutal and tragic case of
Kitty Genovese, who was stabbed to death at
age 28 in Queens, New York, in front of
thirty-seven witnesses, none of whom even
tried to help her, don’t occur in the South.
You can be sure one of us would have done
something although you would not read about
it in the mainstream media. Yes, we have
crime in the South, but if a damsel is in
distress, you can be sure that down here a
southern gentleman will still come to her
rescue. The South upholds the noblest
traditions of these United States: honor,
duty, freedom, and country.
Despite the advances of socialism and
radical feminism (and the definite
feminization of our society), in the South,
it is still okay to be a woman and all that
entails. It is all right and not insulting
for a woman to accept a man’s old-fashioned
politeness and his protection, if the
situation arises. And yet, Southern women
are not helpless. They can be tough when
necessary without losing their femininity.
It is also all right to be a man, because
the warrior spirit survives in Southern men,
the spirit to defend wife, family, and
hearth.
What is the importance of Southern thinkers
like
Jefferson
to your worldview?
The importance of Thomas Jefferson’s legacy
of freedom, individual rights, state
sovereignty (see the forgotten Tenth
Amendment to the Constitution),
constitutional governance and limited
government with the consent of the governed,
cannot be overemphasized. That is why many
left-wing academicians, such as Conor Cruise
O’Brien (who presided over the destruction
of Katanga under the auspices of the United
Nations in the early 1960s) and other
statist, authoritarian, "progressive"
educators have tried belatedly to besmirch
the reputation of Thomas Jefferson, the sage
of Monticello. The freedom tenets upon which
Jefferson built our great American republic
are a formidable obstacle for would be
tyrants and those who want to submerge the
sovereignty of these United States to a
world government under the United Nations.
Jefferson
also remains a threat to those ambitious
politicians who do not want to be bound down
by the chains of the constitution.
You often cite Thomas Jefferson in your
writings. Do you see an application for his
thought to
Cuba?
Cuba
would be well served if her future leaders
were to possess a Jeffersonian vision for
the soon-to-be-free Caribbean nation. I say
future leaders because the prospect of
Jeffersonian freedom is not possible under
the tyrannical rule of Fidel and Raúl
Castro. They have too much blood on their
hands. And that is why in the concluding
chapters of Cuba in Revolution: Escape From
a Lost Paradise, I expound on our Founding
Fathers’ legacy of freedom based on sound,
natural rights theory.
A Jeffersonian vision for Cuba would require
that the Cuban people discard the Stalinist
constitution of 1976 that oppresses them and
subjugates the individual citizen to the
State, rather than protect the individual
from tyranny. That maleficent "constitution"
empowers the State and legalizes despotism
and collectivism, rather than protect the
civil liberties and individual rights of its
citizens.
Rather than enacting the trappings of a
collectivist social democracy as in many
European nations, the Cuban people should
adopt a constitutional republic like these
United States. Here is what Jefferson wrote
on March 11, 1790: "The republican is the
only form of government which is not
eternally at open or secret war with the
rights of mankind." He was backed by his
friend James Madison, who wrote in
Federalist Paper No. 10: "Democracies have
ever been spectacles of turbulence and
contention; have ever been found
incompatible with personal security or the
rights of property; and have in general been
as short in their lives as they have been
violent in their deaths."
What advice can Thomas Jefferson give us for
a hopefully soon emerging Caribbean nation?
In his First Inaugural Address, he said:
"Equal and exact justice to all men, of
whatever state or persuasion, religious or
political; peace, commerce, and honest
friendship with all nations, entangling
alliances with none; freedom of religion;
freedom of the press, and freedom of person
under the protection of the habeas corpus,
and trial by juries impartially selected.
These principles form the bright
constellation which has gone before us and
guided our steps through an age of
revolution and reformation. The wisdom of
our sages and blood of our heroes have been
devoted to their attainment."
I can see no better vision for Cuba than a
Jeffersonian vision of freedom.
January 4, 2003
Myles Kantor [send
him mail] is a columnist for
FrontPageMagazine.com and president of the
Center for
Free Emigration, which agrees
with Frederick Douglass that "It is a
fundamental truth that every man is the
rightful owner of his own body."
Copyright © 2003 LewRockwell.com
Top
^
|