|
The
Encephalitis Outbreak, Hussein And Castro: A
CIA /CDC Cover Up?
Ernesto F. Betancourt, 10/18/99
The October 18-25 issue of The New
Yorker carries a well researched story by
Richard Preston that has created quite a
furor: the possibility that the mysterious
encephalitis outbreak in New York City was
really a deliberate bioterrorist attack
generated by Iraq's Saddam Hussein. The
CIA was described as being deeply involved
in research on biological terrorism and
potentially interested in following up the
Iraqi connection. However, according to a
report on 10/12/99 in The Washington Post, a
CIA anonymous spokesman arrogantly refuted
the story without offering any explanation
to the mysterious outbreak. In fact, he
stated "To imply that there is an
investigation gives it more credibility than
it deserves." Regardless of whether or not
Iraq is involved in this specific outbreak
case, The New Yorker article offers an
interesting lead into possible Cuba-Iraq
cooperation in germ warfare that should not
be ignored.
On page 105 of the magazine, a quotation
is made of a conversation in which Saddam
refers to a dossier about "details of his
ultimate weapon, developed in secret
laboratories outside Iraq...Free of UN
inspection, the laboratories would develop
the SV1417 strain of the West Nile
virus—capable of destroying 97 percent of
all life in an urban environment..." Now,
where could such a research be undertaken?
A few characteristics will help narrow our
location choices:
it must have a technological capability to
undertake such research;
it must be a country friendly to Iraq and
hostile to the US;
it must be outside the reach of any UN
inspection;
it must be a close society, where these
activities can be free of press coverage;
and,
it must be located within the reach of
migratory birds.
There is only one place on earth that
meets those requirements: Castro's Cuba.
Under Castro's close supervision, as will be
explained further, a program for using
migratory birds to introduce epidemics into
the US has been going on in Cuba since the
early eighties. In the recently released
book Biohazard, former Soviet Colonel Ken
Alibek, reports that his boss in the Soviet
germ warfare program returned from Cuba
stating: "the Cubans have developed a germ
warfare capability." This is a fairly
reliable and well informed source. Besides,
the comment was made in a context that was
neither accusatory nor politically
motivated. It was a private conversation
among colleagues.
There are many other indications that
Cuba meets the technology capability
requirement, including the report presented
last year on the Cuba threat to US security
by Secretary of Defense William Cohen
recognizing that Cuba's capabilities in
Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology could
be directed to develop such weapons,
although the
US
had no evidence at that time it had done
so. No report is known on any Cuban effort
to develop weapon delivery systems.
However, Secretary Cohen's comment does not
exclude the possibility that the Pentagon
was not looking for migratory birds and
mosquitoes as delivery systems. In
conclusion, Cuba certainly meets the
technology capability requirement.
Castro's hostility to the US is so well
known that it does not require any
documentation. As to friendly relations
with Iraq, the links go back to the
so-called Non-Aligned Movement meeting in
Cuba back in 1979. Castro even provided
doctors to perform back surgery on Hussein.
As a fellow rogue state,
Cuba
has always supported Iraq at the UN against
the US.
Getting closer to possible cooperation
on germ warfare activities between the two
countries, there is an intriguing piece of
news. Dr. Manuel Limonta, Director of the
Center for Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology, an institution suspected of
being a cover for germ warfare research and
development, was reported in June this year
to have been dismissed from his position
amid widespread rumors of corruption in his
dealings with Iraq. On June 29, 1999, the
regime officially reported his dismissal,
although with the clarification that no
corruption was involved. But the reference
to Iraq reflects the fact that there is some
exchange going on between the two countries
in this field.
This industry is managed under the
direct supervision of Castro, with his
personal Support and Coordination Group
acting parallel to the formal chain of
command. Contrary to reports indicating it
is an industry open and accessible, there
are reports of plants kept under very tight
security rules. In fact, a July 1993 UNDP
mission to draft a program to provide
management assistance and training to the
industry ended in failure when an American
member of that mission, Dr. Stuart Diamond,
attempted to introduce a questionnaire
asking about relationships among the network
of industry enterprises. To the dismay of
the professor, the Cubans saw his
professional good faith inquiry as a spying
effort. The questionnaire was rejected, the
UN was informed they did not want Americans
doing the training and the negotiations
ended in an impasse. So, not even those
trying to help Cuba escape the veil of
secrecy maintained for this industry. As to
being a close society, with the exception of
North Korea, Cuba is as closed as you can
get.
Finally, the research undertaken in Cuba
is precisely centered on developing virus
strains suitable to be inoculated to the
many migratory birds that fly North-South in
the Fall and South-North in the Spring. It
can be concluded that
Cuba
is the most plausible candidate for the germ
warfare research and development activities
referred to by Saddam Hussein in The New
Yorker article.
Therefore, it will be advisable to look
at the other facts related to use of
migratory birds-mosquitoes as delivery
systems in germ warfare. First, two points
related to the
New York
case:
· It was widely reported there was a
diagnostic turnabout in the case of the
outbreak of encephalitis in New York. An
alert staffer at the Bronx Zoo, pathologist
Tracey McNamara, associated an unusual level
of dead birds with swollen brains to the
outbreak. As a result, it was concluded
that the initial
St Louis
virus CDC diagnosis was incorrect The
outbreak was then linked to the West Nile
virus. A recent report added another
virus. But no plausible epidemiological
explanation is still available or at least
has been shared with the public.
· West Nile fever was originally diagnosed
in Uganda in 1937. There was an outbreak in
1950 in Egypt. The most recent outbreak
took place in
Romania
in 1996. John Roehrig of CDC said "it is
not yet clear how the virus got to New York,
but it could be from bird migration or from
virus-carrying imported birds that infected
the area's mosquito population." According
to the researchers quoted, how this virus
reached the
US
is an epidemiological mystery, since it has
never been identified in North or South
America.
As an investigative hypothesis for
solving this epidemiological mystery, it
would be worthwhile to consider some related
events from Cuba. This hypothesis is
predicated on linking a few facts.
· Fact number one is a book published in
1998 by Miami Editorial Universal. The book
is entitled Natumaleza Cubana. Its author
is Carlos Wotzkow, a former researcher at
the Cuban Zoo Institute who now lives in
Switzerland. The book is related to
environmental damage to Cuba caused by
Castro's regime and the author's personal
travails. However, on page 54, Mr. Wotzkow
accuses Dr. Rosa Elena Simeon of falsely
blaming the US for a porcine virus epidemic
that led to a decision to kill all pigs, an
accusation for which, according to Mr.
Wotzkow, she was rewarded with the
presidency of the Cuban Academy of
Sciences. The decision to kill the pigs
"had a dual purpose, to accuse the CIA and
the American government of introducing
infectious diseases in Cuba and to
confiscate the meat from domestic
consumption in order to can it for export to
Africa." This accusation against the CIA,
incidentally, is rebutted in the current
issue of the quarterly journal Critical
Reviews in Microbiology as being totally
unfounded. Reflecting the prevailing
confusion on these matters, the author of
this research also considers Cuba is not
engaged in developing biological weapons.
· On page 57 of Wotzkow's book, fact number
two, the author explains what he calls the
militarization of science in Cuba, as
experienced at the Zoological Institute. He
claims he was fired, among other reasons,
for his opposition to a military project
within the Institute. The project was
proposed by Castro himself and led to the
creation of what was called the Biological
Front: "An idea to undertake biological
warfare against United States territory
through introducing viruses of infectious
diseases inoculated in migratory birds."
According to Mr. Wotzkow, as a result, the
Zoo Institute--eventually merged into
another agency--became associated with the
Pedro Kouri Tropical Medicine Institute in
research aimed at identifying viruses that
could be transmitted through birds.
· Raul Castro is reported to have expressed,
in a private conversation early in the
eighties, the intention of the Cuban
Government to retaliate in kind against the
US
for introducing viruses such as the one that
allegedly caused the Hemorrhagic Dengue
epidemic, by resorting to the same tactics
allegedly used by the US. In Alibek's book,
Castro's decision to undertake the
development of germ warfare capabilities is
linked to his accusation that the US was
responsible for the outbreak of Hemorrhagic
Dengue in the early eighties. In addition,
on January 29, 1997, Fidel Castro warned
the US that Cuba "was a lamb that the dragon
could find was filled with poison," a
statement interpreted as a veiled threat of
Cuba's
potential use of germ warfare against the
US.
These statements tend to support what Mr.
Wotzkow denounces in his book. This is fact
number three.
· Whatever the motivations, the fact is that
Castro has been for almost twenty years
engaged in the development of germ warfare
capabilities as well as in a delivery system
using migratory birds to introduce epidemics
into the US to be transmitted by
mosquitoes. The huge investment on genetic
engineering and biotechnology plants,
reported by Science and Business to reach
one billion dollars, could easily hide these
activities. Since Cuba lacks the financial
resources to make such an investment, one
has to wonder if Hussein is paying for this
in exchange for doing his bidding in germ
warfare.
· The effort involved is described by Dr.
Luis Roberto Hernandez in an interview with
El Nuevo Herald. In that interview, Dr.
Hernandez, at present a professor of
Entomology at the
University
of Puerto Rico, reports he worked in the
Biological Front Project until 1995, when
he defected in London. They identified and
produced virus strains and selected
migratory birds to carry them. The center
is located in secret installations outside
the Miramar complex housing the rest of the
biotechnology laboratories, at the farm La
Chata, the former country home of President
Carlos Prio Socarras. The Cuban researchers
were unwittingly and naively helped in their
program by American researchers who shared
with them information on techniques related
to "ringing" migratory birds and the data
obtained about their migratory habits from
that research. According to La Revista
Cubana de Medicina Tropical, Vol. 11, 1996,
unaware of what the Cubans were doing, CDC
provided them in 1988 with strains of the
St Louis
virus to further their research.
That is fact number four.
· In July this year, the Cuban government
organized a trial, before the usual kangaroo
court that has typified the Castro regime,
accusing the US of genocide against Cuba.
The court issued an unenforceable sentence
ordering the US to pay reparations amounting
to US$ 181 billion. This trial was based
mostly on the embargo and actions such as
the Bay of Pigs. Charge Number VII,
however, covers accusations that the US was
responsible for introducing the viruses that
caused porcine and hemorrhagic fever
epidemics as well as many other hostile
actions in biological warfare. The
individual accusations are now being
broadcast daily in one hour TV programs.
Vitral, a Catholic Church publication,
complained that these broadcasts aimed at
encouraging
US
hatred among Cubans. This is fact number
five.
· The virus first appeared in
New York
in July and August shortly after birds
returned North. Then, during the recent
initial session of the UN General Assembly
the Cuban delegation made the genocide
accusation the central issue of its attacks
against the US, including undertaking
biological warfare measures. The return of
this delegation to Havana was unique. They
were received at a mass event at Havana
University, Castro addressed the event. On
September 30, 1999, the Granma headline
stated: "Historic and victorious battle
right in the Empire's heart." Could this
victory be fact number six?
· Surprisingly, among the delegation
speakers at Havana University was Dr. Rosa
Elena Simeon, the same woman who made the
initial accusations against the CIA and now
heads the agency directly accountable to
Castro for overseeing research to send
viruses to the US by inoculating migratory
birds. There was no explanation given as to
why this woman, who has no diplomatic role
to play in the delegation to the UN General
Assembly, was included. Could it be she came
under diplomatic cover to verify delivery
system preparations on the US side or
because something went wrong? Could this be
fact number seven?
Nobody is saying that these individual
pieces of evidence conclusively prove that
the
New York
encephalitis outbreak has been caused by
Cuba. They raise quite a plausible
hypothesis, however. As is applied in
police investigations these are significant
indications the Cubans had the motive, the
opportunity and the weapon. It could be
that CDC finds a completely unrelated
explanation to this specific outbreak. But
as long as they are not able to provide such
alternative explanation, they neither have
the right to summarily reject any
hypothesis, nor to refuse to investigate, as
was stated by the anonymous CIA spokesman.
Much less when CDC unwittingly helped the
Cuban research effort that may have resulted
in creating this potential threat.
In the context of the possibility that
Cuba is the surrogate country mentioned by
Saddam Hussein in The New Yorker article,
the urgency of a thorough investigation of
these facts cannot be exaggerated.
Americans have a need and a right to
know. The situation demands a thorough and
unambiguous explanation, not an arrogant
cover-up.
Top
^ |