|
I won’t visit
Cuba
Again until Castro sets it free
NORM COLEMAN
www.coleman.senate.gov
The future of
U.S.
policy toward Cuba is bound in two tides of
change.
* First is the momentum building in the
United States to engage with Cuba. United
States policy toward Cuba over the last 40
years has not brought change. Fidel Castro
has outlasted eight U.S. presidents, and in
the post-Cold War world, Cuba no longer
poses a strategic threat to us.
Americans have recognized
Cuba
as a potential market for our agricultural
goods, which under a 2000 law can be
exported to the island. Sen.Mike Enzi, R-Wyo.,
has introduced a bill in the Senate that
would lift the restrictions against
Americans traveling to Cuba, and Sen. Max
Baucus, D-Mont, has introduced legislation
that would end the U.S. trade embargo
against Cuba.
* Second is the demand for human rights for
the people of Cuba. Cuba is no paradise.
Cubans lack the right to free speech, free
association and free enterprise. The sheer
numbers of Cubans leaving for our shores
speak to the disastrous state of human
rights in
Cuba.
Last year, at great personal risk, more than
30,000 Cubans signed a petition, the Varela
Project, calling for a referendum on
democracy and human rights in Cuba. The
Cuban government responded with a wave of
repression, arresting more than 75 leading
dissidents. This crackdown drew harsh
criticism from even those who had been most
tolerant of the Castro government.
Like many other Americans, I believed that
the best way to promote change in Cuba was
through increased trade and travel -- a
position that put me at odds with the
administration. With this view in mind and
with great concern over the crackdown that
began this spring -- I recently traveled to
Cuba.
I met with Cuban officials and had
satisfactory discussions about the
opportunities for agricultural sales from my
state of Minnesota. During these meetings, I
also raised my concerns about human rights.
I spent time with the other face of Cuba,
too. I met some of the few leading
dissidents who are not in prison -- Osvaldo
Paya of the Varela Project, and Elizardo
Sanchez and Vladimiro Roca of Todos Unidos,
an umbrella group for various human-rights
organizations. I also met with the wives of
some of Cuba’s political prisoners.
I also learned about several dissidents,
among them:
* Roberto de Miranda, who was sentenced to
20 years for organizing a teachers’ union
and for signing the Varela Project petition.
* Pedro Alvarez Ramos, a labor organizer,
who was sentenced to 25 years in a prison
some 265 miles from his family’s home in
Havana.
* Oscar Espinosa Chepe, an independent
economist and journalist, who was sentenced
to 20 years and is suffering from chronic
liver disease.
For women, trying to remain in contact with
their imprisoned husbands is another source
of heartache. After traveling hundreds of
miles for scheduled meetings with their
husbands (in a country where few people own
automobiles), the women arrive at the
prisons only to find out that the
appointments have been canceled for no
apparent reason. Scheduled telephone calls
are similarly called off.
I continue to believe that both tides of
change are inevitable. Thanks to the brave
efforts of people such as Paya and others,
Cuba will change someday. And I am equally
certain that the United States one day will
lift its embargo and travel restrictions.
I want to go back to
Cuba.
I want to enjoy its beautiful beaches and to
engage its welcoming people. I want two
million Americans tourists to spend money in
Cuba and lift its economy -- but not while
Chepe, de Miranda and many others serve
unjust prison sentences for seeking freedom.
The United States should end its embargo on
Cuba when the Cuban government ends its
embargo on its own people.
Castro, let your imprisoned dissidents go --
and when you do, I will gladly join the
chorus of people seeking to end the travel
ban and trade embargo.
Senator Norm Coleman, R-Minn, is chairman of
the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on
Western Hemisphere, Peace Corps and
Narcotics Affairs and a member of the Senate
Agriculture Committee.
Top
^
|