| 
Cuban Policy in
the Middle East*: A Cuba-Iran Axis ?
Fidel
Castro began to cultivate an alliance with Iran soon after Ayatollah
Khomeini rose to power in 1979. Despite the opposition of
fundamentalist Islam to Marxist ideology, Castro sought common
ground to foster an intimate relationship with the Ayatollah's
regime. "We do not think there is contradiction between religion and
revolution," Castro declared shortly after Khomeini's followers
drove the Shah into exile.(1) Soon after the triumph of Khomeini's
Islamist revolution, the Cuban leader dispatched his emissaries to
the Ayatollah in search of close ties with the new regime in Tehran.
By 1981, when an Iranian government delegation visited Havana,
Castro had professed his admiration for the "revolutionary role of
Islam" and invited "the Islamic Republic of Iran to have an embassy
in Cuba."(2)
Beyond
rhetoric, Castro also aligned Cuban foreign policy in support of
Iranian aims and positions. Havana backed Tehran at the height of
Iran's confrontation with Washington in the early 1980s and adhered
to "the plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran...[for] the expulsion
of the Zionist regime [Israel] from the United Nations."(3) However,
due to Iran's war in the 1980s with Saddam Hussein's Iraq, at the
time one of Castro's longest-standing allies in the Middle East, the
Cuban government devoted most of its energies to a futile pursuit of
unity among its two friends in the Persian Gulf region.(4)
Since
the early 1990s, Castro has successfully transcended differences in
language, culture, and religion in his quest to forge new strategic
bonds with Tehran. As evinced by regular consultations at the
highest levels, joint scientific endeavors of relevance to national
and international security concerns, and coordinated responses to
undermine American initiatives and influence in both Latin America
and the Middle East, a Cuba-Iran axis today is no mere phantom
menace. Driven by their leaders' deep-seated ideological and
theological animosity toward the United States in particular and
liberal democratic values in general, the orchestration of efforts
by Cuba and Iran -- two state sponsors of terrorism -- constitutes a
threat to U.S. foreign policies and interests.
A MEETING
OF MINDS
Fidel
Castro sees in Tehran a "bastion of dignity and independence."(5)
During his long-awaited visit to Iran in May 2001, the Lider Maximo
of the Cuban revolution and the Islamic Republic's own Supreme
Leader clearly saw eye to eye in their antipathy toward the United
States. The affinity of Castro's thought with the radical Islamist
ideology espoused by the Iranian government was manifest when
Khomeini's successor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Castro discussed
"Iran-Cuban cooperation" in response to U.S. "hegemony."(6)
Seemingly preaching to the choir, Ayatollah Khamenei proclaimed
before Castro that "the United States is weak and extremely
vulnerable today," and hoped that "U.S. grandeur can be broken." For
his part, Castro concurred with words that affirmed and perfectly
dovetailed Khameinei's sentiments: "Iran and Cuba, in cooperation
with each other, can bring America to its knees. The U.S. regime is
very weak, and we are witnessing this weakness from close up."(7)
IDEOLOGY
MEETS BIOTECHNOLOGY
During
his visit to Cuba in 2000, Iranian President Khatami toured Havana's
flagship Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) and
praised the Castro regime's achievements in science and technology.
In reference to the United States, Khatami railed against
"imperialistic...countries who seek greater economic power" and
defiantly declared that "those powers could not monopolize knowledge
and technology." To counteract the monopoly of science by the
world's powers that be, Khatami called on states such as Cuba and
Iran to "absorb the required technology by developing the level of
their knowledge."(8)
As
Khatami's speech at Cuba's landmark biotechnology facility
indicated, scientific collaboration between Havana and Tehran has
played a central role in the forging of a tight bond between the two
totalitarian states in recent years. Since the early 1990s the Cuban
government has entered into several biotechnology cooperation
accords and transfer agreements with Iran. The Castro regime has not
only transferred to Iran the island's self-developed technology for
a hepatitis-b vaccine, erythropoietin (EPO), interferon,
streptokinase, and other biotechnology products, but also shipped to
Tehran the necessary production equipment. Cuba has also provided
advanced training in biotechnology techniques to some 30 Iranian
scientists.(9) The state-controlled Pasteur Institute of Iran
established its biotechnology department in 1993, the same year that
Cuba and Iran signed their first biotechnology cooperation
accord.(10) Among those who have pursued advanced biotechnology
studies in Cuba is Dr. Behrouz Vaziri, a senior scientist at the
Pasteur Insitute in Tehran, who received his postdoctoral training
in protein characterization at Havana's CIGB from 1997 to 1998.(11)
In addition to the training of personnel, the transfer of know-how,
and the ongoing work of Cuban scientists and technicians in Iran, in
1996 Cuba's CIGB formed a joint venture firm, Noavaran Tec Kish,
with the Iran's Pasteur Institute. The facility, valued at US$60
million, has been described by Cuba's official press as "the most
modern [biotechnology complex] of its type in the Middle East."(12)
While
supplying life-saving drugs to the Iranian people may be one of
Fidel Castro's motives, particularly given the Cuban dictator's
exalted vision of himself as protector of the Third World,
revolutionary solidarity alone does not account for Havana's
altruism toward "the most active state sponsor of terrorism in
2003."(13) According to Dr. Jose de la Fuente, who oversaw
biotechnology research and development at Havana's CIGB from 1991 to
1998, "The strengthening of Cuban-Iranian cooperation began with
Cuban aid shortly after the Iranian earthquake of 1990...[and]
culminated in Iran buying outright [Cuba's]...recombinant protein
production technologies in yeast and Escherichia coli, as well as
large-scale purification protocols for both soluble and insoluble
proteins synthesized in or excreted by them." Given Castro's
historically anti-American foreign policy, it would be naive to
ascribe such a degree of willful proliferation of dual-use
biotechnology(14) to merely humanitarian concerns. As Dr. De la
Fuente has observed, "There is no one who truly believes that Iran
is interested in these technologies [solely] for the purpose of
protecting all the children in the Middle East from hepatitis, or
treating their people with cheap streptokinase when they suffer
sudden cardiac arrest."(15)
STRATEGIC
LOCATION
Cuba's
strategic geographical location has also proved to be extremely
valuable to Iran's political establishment. During last summer's
widespread protests by reform-minded Iranian university students
against repressive clerical rule, authorities in Tehran turned to
Havana for assistance in interfering with the satellite transmission
of broadcasts by U.S.-based Farsi-language TV stations. Cuba, with
decades of experience in jamming U.S. broadcasts directed at the
island, used its Chinese-equipped electronic warfare base near
Havana to effectively interfere with the signals. The jamming was
identified by a U.S. company as originating some 20 miles outside
the city of Havana, precisely in the vicinity of Bejucal where the
Cuban military's telecommunications monitoring facility is
located.(16)
CUBA
AND IRAN: AXIS OF EVIL?
What
has Cuba obtained, while inciting American ire, from such close
cooperation with Iran? According to U.S. media sources the island
nation is "increasingly dependent on Iranian oil," which Tehran
apparently ships in generous volumes to the cash-strapped Castro
regime.(17) The Iranian government has also extended an annual EUR
20 million (currently US$24.5 million) trade credit line to Havana
with a generous two-year repayment term. Thanks to Tehran's economic
accords with Havana, Iran is also a captive market for Cuba's
limited export offerings. Bilateral trade has thus risen from under
US$20 million in 2001 to US$50 million by the close of 2003.(18)
However, it would be erroneous to characterize Cuba's
relationship with Iran in primarily economic terms. While Havana
undoubtedly benefits from Iranian oil imports, trade financing, and
other crutches for the ever-ailing Cuban economy, Fidel Castro does
not conduct foreign policy based on purely rational economic
factors. On the contrary, Cuba's careful cultivation of relations
with Iran illustrates that, with Castro, ideology and political
objectives ultimately trump all other considerations. In this regard
Islamist Iran and communist Cuba are birds of a feather. Driven by a
lifelong hatred of the 'Yankee empire' and its free-market values,
Castro's dream is to ultimately slay the capitalist dragon and bring
the American Goliath down on its knees. Deliberately selling or
sharing Cuban biotechnology to, and placing the island's scientists
and technicians at the service of, a terrorist state follows
logically from Castro's worldview. Those who dismiss ideology as
mere rhetoric do so at their own peril.
After
lauding the Islamic revolution for toppling the Shah of Iran, Castro
reminded his student audience at the University of Tehran in May
2001 that "one shah remains in the world." In bold remarks that won
him ecstatic ovations from the radical Islamic youth that filled the
lecture hall, Castro referred to "the shah of imperialism which is
entrenched near my homeland," calling Cuba's neighbor to the north
"an exploiting shah that wants to impose its system on the entire
world and drag it into oppression." Castro then exclaimed to the
jubilant crowd, "But as the shah of Iran was overthrown, this shah
too will fall!"(19)
Castro's language should not be misconstrued as mere
demagoguery. Fidel Castro's willful disregard for the propagation of
Cuba's most advanced dual-use biotechnology raises grave concerns.
Castro has always been a man of action and, given the United States'
current preoccupation with the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction, it would be wise to recall Castro's unequivocal words
to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev at the height of the Cuba
missile crisis in 1962: "I wrote to Khrushchev [on October 26,
1962]...It was my opinion that, in case of an invasion, it was
necessary to launch a massive and total nuclear strike [against the
United States]."(20)
________________________________________________________
NOTES
1. Cf.
Damian J. Fernandez, Cuba's Foreign Policy in the Middle East
(Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988), p. 86.
2. Ibid.,
pp. 86-87.
3. Ibid.,
pp. 87-88.
4. Ibid.,
p. 87.
5. BBC
Monitoring Latin America, "Fidel Castro has 'free and frank' talks
with President Khatami in Tehran," Tehran, 8 May 2001.
6.
Agence-France Presse, "Iran and Cuba bolster ties, strengthen
anti-US solidarity," Tehran, 10 May 2001.
7. Ibid.
8. IRNA,
"President Khatami inspects Cuban biotechnology center," Havana,
October 1, 2001.
9. Nuclear
Threat Initiative (NTI), "Iran Profile - Biological Facilities:
Pasteur Institute,"
[http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iran/Biological/2305_2375.html].
10. Ibid.
See also Pasteur Institute of Iran, [www.pasteur.ac.ir].
11. Cf.
curriculum vitae of Dr. Behrouz Vaziri, Department of Biotechnology,
Pasteur Institute of Iran, posted online at
[http://www.iranbiotech.com/workshops/downstream/vaziri.asp].
12. EFE, "Iran acusa a EEUU retraso construccion fabrica medicinas
con Cuba," Tehran, May 9, 2001; Cuba, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(MINREX) website, under "Republica Islamica de Iran,"
[http://www.cubaminrex.cu/REGIONALES/AFNMO/ANMO_Iran.htm; and Elson
Concepcion Perez, "Fidel in Iran," Granma Internacional (Cuba), 9
May 2001, [http://www.granma.cu/ingles/mayo2/19argel3-i.html].
13. Cf.
U.S. Department of State, "Overview of State-Sponsored Terrorism,"
Patterns of Global Terrorism 2003,
[http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/pgtrpt/2003/31644.htm].
14.
According to the Centre for Defence and International Security
Studies (CDISS) at Lancaster University (UK), "any nation with a
basic pharmaceutical industry -- or even a facility such as a
brewery -- has a de facto capability to produce biological weapons."
Cf. [http://www.cdiss.org/bw.htm].
15. Cf.
Jose de la Fuente, "Wine into vinegar: the fall of Cuba's
biotechnology," Nature Biotechnology, October 2001 (Vol. 19, Num.
11).
16. Robert
Windrem, "U.S. satellite feeds to Iran jammed," NBC News, 11 July
2003.
17. Ibid.
18. IRNA,
"Iran dissatisfied with Tehran-Havana economic exchange," Madrid, 14
April 2004.
19. Ma'mud
Shirvani, "Fidel Castro in Iran: 'The shah of imperialism will fall
too'," The Militant, May 28, 2001 (Vol. 65/No. 21), [http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6521/652103.html].
20. Cf. Vincent Touze, "Las amargas confesiones de Fidel," Clarin
(Buenos Aires, Argentina), 14 September 1997, [http://old.clarin.com.ar/diario/1997/09/14/suplementos/i-00602e.htm].
__________________________________________________________________
*Second of
a two-part series on Cuba's historic involvement in, and
contemporary ties to, the Mideast region. See also Issue 53 (March
23, 2004) of Cuba Focus on "Cuban Foreign Policy in the Middle East:
Part I."
Back to Articles
|